Latest arrival: Omega 265 9CT Gold dating from 1963, running very very well and all original
3 posters
Omega
domecurb- Admin
- Posts : 3326
Join date : 2016-09-18
Location : Scotland
SeikoJohn- Admin
- Posts : 2739
Join date : 2016-09-19
Age : 52
Location : Middlesbrough
Very smart very smart indeed. , Not like you to go for a dress watch , is there a bezel missing 
domecurb- Admin
- Posts : 3326
Join date : 2016-09-18
Location : Scotland
SeikoJohn wrote:Very smart very smart indeed. , Not like you to go for a dress watch , is there a bezel missing
there is
i shall super glue it on tomorrow 
daff62- FULL MEMBER
- Posts : 1911
Join date : 2016-09-26
Well done with your new purchase, that’s a beautiful watch.
It looks great on your wrist and definitely a classical elegant watch to be worn and enjoyed.
It looks great on your wrist and definitely a classical elegant watch to be worn and enjoyed.
domecurb- Admin
- Posts : 3326
Join date : 2016-09-18
Location : Scotland
daff62 wrote:Well done with your new purchase, that’s a beautiful watch.
It looks great on your wrist and definitely a classical elegant watch to be worn and enjoyed.
i would keep it if it was a year older then it would be a birth year watch, unfortunately its just out..........one of these days
daff62- FULL MEMBER
- Posts : 1911
Join date : 2016-09-26
domecurb wrote:daff62 wrote:Well done with your new purchase, that’s a beautiful watch.
It looks great on your wrist and definitely a classical elegant watch to be worn and enjoyed.
i would keep it if it was a year older then it would be a birth year watch, unfortunately its just out..........one of these days
Had you bought it as a birth year watch? The hallmark might be 1963 but the movement serial number could be for 1962 which I think would be a 19 million number.
If it’s not meant to be and it’s destined for being sold let me know if it’s going to be on eBay or if you have a price for it. That said I think you should keep hold of it as it is a lovely dress watch.
domecurb- Admin
- Posts : 3326
Join date : 2016-09-18
Location : Scotland
daff62 wrote:domecurb wrote:daff62 wrote:Well done with your new purchase, that’s a beautiful watch.
It looks great on your wrist and definitely a classical elegant watch to be worn and enjoyed.
i would keep it if it was a year older then it would be a birth year watch, unfortunately its just out..........one of these days
Had you bought it as a birth year watch? The hallmark might be 1963 but the movement serial number could be for 1962 which I think would be a 19 million number.
If it’s not meant to be and it’s destined for being sold let me know if it’s going to be on eBay or if you have a price for it. That said I think you should keep hold of it as it is a lovely dress watch.
its 21 million number so 1963, it was sold as a 1966 but i knew it was earlier, but couldn't pin it down without the number sadly
daff62- FULL MEMBER
- Posts : 1911
Join date : 2016-09-26
domecurb wrote:daff62 wrote:domecurb wrote:daff62 wrote:Well done with your new purchase, that’s a beautiful watch.
It looks great on your wrist and definitely a classical elegant watch to be worn and enjoyed.
i would keep it if it was a year older then it would be a birth year watch, unfortunately its just out..........one of these days
Had you bought it as a birth year watch? The hallmark might be 1963 but the movement serial number could be for 1962 which I think would be a 19 million number.
If it’s not meant to be and it’s destined for being sold let me know if it’s going to be on eBay or if you have a price for it. That said I think you should keep hold of it as it is a lovely dress watch.
its 21 million number so 1963, it was sold as a 1966 but i knew it was earlier, but couldn't pin it down without the number sadly
It was worth taking the chance as it’s still a lovely watch. It’s possibly hallmarked in 1966 though a 21 million movement number dates it to approx 1964.
Are you looking for a birth year watch or a gold one that can be dated by the hallmark or specifically an Omega one from 1962?
Don’t be in too much of a hurry parting with the Omega you did get, it’s a lovely dress watch as well as a really nice addition to your collection.
domecurb- Admin
- Posts : 3326
Join date : 2016-09-18
Location : Scotland
daff62 wrote:domecurb wrote:daff62 wrote:domecurb wrote:daff62 wrote:Well done with your new purchase, that’s a beautiful watch.
It looks great on your wrist and definitely a classical elegant watch to be worn and enjoyed.
i would keep it if it was a year older then it would be a birth year watch, unfortunately its just out..........one of these days
Had you bought it as a birth year watch? The hallmark might be 1963 but the movement serial number could be for 1962 which I think would be a 19 million number.
If it’s not meant to be and it’s destined for being sold let me know if it’s going to be on eBay or if you have a price for it. That said I think you should keep hold of it as it is a lovely dress watch.
its 21 million number so 1963, it was sold as a 1966 but i knew it was earlier, but couldn't pin it down without the number sadly
It was worth taking the chance as it’s still a lovely watch. It’s possibly hallmarked in 1966 though a 21 million movement number dates it to approx 1964.
Are you looking for a birth year watch or a gold one that can be dated by the hallmark or specifically an Omega one from 1962?
Don’t be in too much of a hurry parting with the Omega you did get, it’s a lovely dress watch as well as a really nice addition to your collection.
quite honestly i would just like a nice watch from 1962, as long as its decent quality i dont mind the brand or the what metal, although not chrome over brass
if you are interested in the Omega you can make a bid
Similar topics
|
|
|
» sub £50 screwdriver set
» Anyone bought anything during lockdown
» How is everybody
» 2020 future watch collection
» 31st December 2019
» Happy new year too you all
» Merry Christmas
» 13th November 2019